Department of Defense Announces Energy Potential Study

The Department of Defense (DoD) could generate 7000 megawatts (MW) of solar  energy — equivalent to the output of seven nuclear power plants — on four  military bases located in the California desert, according to a study released  today by DoD’s Office of Installations and Environment. The year-long study,  conducted by the consultancy ICF International, looked at seven military bases  in California and two in Nevada. It finds that, even though 96 percent of the  surface area of the nine bases is unsuited for solar development because of  military use, endangered species and other factors, the solar-compatible area is  nevertheless large enough to generate more than 30 times the electricity  consumed by the California bases, or about 25 percent of the renewable energy  that the State of California is requiring utilities to use by 2015.

The Department of Defense is seeking to develop solar, wind, geothermal and  other distributed energy sources on its bases both to reduce their $4  billion-a-year energy bill and to make them less dependent on the commercial  electricity grid. Such on-site energy generation, together with energy storage  and so-called smart-microgrid technology, would allow a military base to  maintain its critical operations “off-grid” for weeks or months if the grid is  disrupted.

The ICF study looks in detail at the seven DoD installations that are located  in California’s Mojave and Colorado deserts: Fort Irwin, Naval Air Weapons  Station China Lake, the Marine Corps’ Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range,  Edwards Air Force Base, Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow, Marine Corps Air  Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms and Naval Air Facility El Centro. The  study also looks at two Air Force bases located in the Nevada desert, Creech and  Nellis.

Most of the surface area of the installations consists of undeveloped ranges  used for training and other military activities that the study finds are  incompatible with solar facilities. In addition, using detailed Geographic  Information System data, ICF ruled out large portions of the bases’ developed  areas because of the presence of cultural and biological resources, flash flood  hazards and other conflicts. For each area that survived the geographic  screening process, ICF looked at the technical feasibility of six alternative  solar technologies and at the economic viability under private versus military  ownership.

The study concludes that 25,000 acres are “suitable” for solar development  and another 100,000 acres are “likely” or “questionably” suitable for solar. ICF  assumed that 100 percent of the “suitable” land and 25 percent of the “likely”  or “questionably” suitable land would be developed for solar energy. According  to the study, the largest amount of economically viable acreage is found at  Edwards Air Force Base (24,327 acres), followed by Fort Irwin (18,728 acres),  China Lake (6,777) and Twentynine Palms (553 acres). ICF found little or no  economically viable acreage on the other California bases (Barstow, El Centro  and Chocolate Mountain) or the two Nevada bases, principally because the  military’s use of the land is incompatible with solar development.

Finally, the study finds that private developers can tap the solar potential  on these installations with no capital investment requirement from DoD, and that  the development could yield the federal government up to $100 million a year in  revenue or other benefits such as discounted power.

A copy of the study can be found at

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.